10 Sep 2009
Despite losing its distribution deal with security vendor RSA, Bell Micro is remaining upbeat and plans to add staff, customers and vendor partners over the coming months.
RSA completed its distribution review earlier this month and will maintain relationships with Sphinx and Computerlinks. Avnet, Magirus and DNS Arrow were considered as new additions, but they all missed out.
Ed Callacher, Bell’s divisional manager for networking and security, expressed his disappointment but stressed it was “business as usual”.
Further reading
“We provided good growth to RSA,” he added. “But, for them, it made sense to retreat back to specialist distribution. Personally, I think it will limit their rate of growth for new products.”
Callacher revealed that Bell would look to fill the gap left by RSA.
In the meantime, the decision allows the distributor to “refocus the resources we had on RSA on another vendor”, he said.
Bell’s security wing will continue to increase headcount, Callacher asserted.
“And if there is a new or emerging technology, we will look at new vendors,” he said.
Dave Ellis, director of e-security at Computerlinks, claimed he was “very pleased” by RSA’s decision.
“The new data leakage protection products require a more specialist channel,” he added.
Simon Aron, joint managing director of RSA reseller Eurodata, said the move would have no impact on his business because he bought from Sphinx. “As long as RSA has two distributors, I am happy,” he said.
Related articles
CRN's premier networking event is back on 17 May at the Ricoh Arena
Date: Thu 17 May 2012
Channel fighters preparing to square up once more on 24 May
Date: Thu 24 May 2012
The proliferation of endpoint devices within the enterprise has highlighted the shortcomings of one of the traditional approaches to data security
This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps
Dave discovers that rozzers are seemingly living in the technology dark ages
Mark Needham, founder of distributor Widget, argues that John Browett leaves for Apple with Dixons in better shape than when he arrived
Do you agree?
Have your say