09 Dec 2009
Comments:1
Cisco's imminent $3.4bn (£2.1bn) acquisition of Tandberg could spell trouble for the videoconferencing vendor's reseller base, channel onlookers have asserted.
Now the networking giant has bought more than 90 per cent of Tandberg shares, the last obstacle to the deal is a US Department of Justice (DoJ) investigation into possible antitrust issues.
Cisco and Tandberg have been engaged in a cat and mouse saga since the deal was initially agreed in September, with the buy-out price eventually being raised by $400m. Terry Dwyer, managing director of Tandberg Platinum Partner mvision, welcomed news of the deal's seemingly inevitable fruition.
Further reading
"I think this is finally the real starting point for videoconferencing, " he said. "With Cisco's marketing money and Tandberg's excellent product range, we are going to see mass adoption."
But Dwyer cautioned that blending the two channels could precipitate a wave of consolidation. He added that many video dealers have been niche specialists surviving on marquee accounts with large enterprises that supplied up to 80 per cent of sales.
"We cannot bring in 500 new dealers and not expect to see some change in the market," he said. "Will the market expand so rapidly that there will be enough business for everybody?
"There will be a great deal of consolidation – some of the big Cisco guys will come to us for our Tandberg expertise and we will want them for their Cisco expertise. For us, it will be a case of skilling up where we see a commercial value in doing so and partnering in other areas where we cannot see the value in investing.
"Of course, there are going to be some traditional video dealers that are not going to go fast enough. Some will look for a way out and there will be Cisco dealers looking to buy them. Most (video dealers) are owner/manager businesses, and a few of them will see 2010 as a good year to retire."
Robert Stead, EMEA marketing director at rival vendor Polycom, claimed merging the channels would be a tough task. He added that the deal's ongoing uncertainty could allow his firm to steal a march in the market.
"It is certainly true that the two channels are different and not entirely complementary and there has got to be a big amount of concern," he said. "There is a DoJ enquiry still going on and all that is going to generate fear, uncertainty and doubt as to what happens to the various channel partners and the product roadmap."
But Stead was another to welcome the acquisition as good news for the video market.
"This is ultimately going to be pretty positive," he said. "It is a validation of the market and moves it even more firmly into the mainstream."
Related articles
CRN's premier networking event is back on 17 May at the Ricoh Arena
Date: Thu 17 May 2012
Channel fighters preparing to square up once more on 24 May
Date: Thu 24 May 2012
The proliferation of endpoint devices within the enterprise has highlighted the shortcomings of one of the traditional approaches to data security
This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps
Dave discovers that rozzers are seemingly living in the technology dark ages
Mark Needham, founder of distributor Widget, argues that John Browett leaves for Apple with Dixons in better shape than when he arrived
Do you agree?
VAR purge is good
I don't have any idea why polycom is marking this merger as a way to get customer and vendor based soley on the FUD caused by this merger. there will be a purge and is will be the weak and lazy that leave the market the smart and/or strong will merge. The VAR that want to really be UC players will adapt to the new landscape. Polycom playing the only independent VC provider as a go to market stratagy is flawed in so many ways - everyone is headed to a Unified stratagy and Polycom is playing to a "independent" role in this space - please how stupid can one be. Polycom claims that vendors and customer would have doubts or confusion about service and products if they do then smart people ask questions stupid people just run. Cisco is a fine company on it's own but had no real VC products for 95 per cent of the market and a Telepresence product for the other five per cent, but that product was for the most part interoperable with everythign else in the market. Tandberg is a fine company that had VC products for 100 per cent of the market. Now Cisco has a fine company with a VC products for 100 per cent of the VC market, network hardware and services to upgrade networks to support video and Tandberg's R&D that lead them from nothing 10 years ago to the market leader.
I bought Polycom stock thinking they would be picked up soon and quick but now after real research i can see why they are going to languish on the market unloved.
Confusing product mix
overlapping price points
aging core product - MGC
frequent forklift upgrades for new features
confused R&D - developing on product that can't talk to another
seperate marketing audio vs video
listen to the 3rd qtr report they mention Tandberg more than they mention themselves
they are poised to lose a large MCU market share when VTC engineers realize that the MGC can not be upgraded past the MPM+ platform - forklift upgrade required. Smart engineers will evaluate and find that new Polycom solutions are a few revs behind Radvision and Tandberg
Posted by BasicItOne | 10 Dec 2009
Have your say