Wireless LAN vendor Meru Networks is set to rake in about $60m (£40m) from its initial public offering (IPO), with the firm's market capitalisation set to top $200m.
The California-based firm's IPO will contain 4.39 million common shares at between $13 and $15 per share. If the shares price in the mid to upper range of this bracket, Meru's market cap will comfortably exceed $200m. It is not known yet when the IPO will take place. Meru will trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker MERU.
Meru was founded eight years ago and has raised well over $100m in venture capital funding since then. The firm's backers include Clearstone Venture Partners, Neocarta Ventures, Tenaya Capital, Evercore Ventures, Monitor Venture Partners, BlueStream Ventures and the DE Shaw Group. Meru has never banked a full-year profit and turned over $69m in 2009.
Further reading
Late last year the vendor confirmed its intention to go public, bringing to an end several years of speculation that the firm was looking for a buyer. Recent research from VentureSource revealed venture capital investment in US IT start-ups plummeted 35 per cent annually in 2009. Meru becomes the latest in a line of channel firms to go public in recent months.
Security specialist Fortinet floated on the NASDAQ in November, while vendor Force10 Networks filed its IPO prospectus earlier this month. The NASDAQ also welcomed back Bell Micro in January, two years after the broadliner was axed from the market for failing to meet filing requirements.
CRN's premier networking event is back on 17 May at the Ricoh Arena
Date: Thu 17 May 2012
Channel fighters preparing to square up once more on 24 May
Date: Thu 24 May 2012
The proliferation of endpoint devices within the enterprise has highlighted the shortcomings of one of the traditional approaches to data security
This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps
Dave discovers that rozzers are seemingly living in the technology dark ages
Mark Needham, founder of distributor Widget, argues that John Browett leaves for Apple with Dixons in better shape than when he arrived
Do you agree?
Have your say