14 May 2009
Comments:1
As 3Com hunts for partners to sell its H3C enterprise gear, the networking vendor’s EMEA boss has called for a return to the channel mindset of the early 1990s.
Mike Ansley, vice president EMEA at 3Com, has lashed out at rivals for spreading themselves too thinly and letting their channel programmatics spiral out of control.
He hailed 3Com’s new channel authorisation programme for H3C – the high-end networking brand it recently bought outright from Chinese vendor Huawei – as a return to the ideals of the previous decade.
Further reading
Ansley revealed 3Com is looking to sign up just a small handful of UK resellers in a bid to create a “narrow and profitable” EMEA channel for H3C.
“In the early 1990s you would not see anyone selling multiple vendors. As manufacturers have broadened their VAR base and vice versa, neither one of them has won. How can you sell five networking manufacturers and believe you can do a good job?”
Ansley said 3Com would stand in front of the customer and work with the channel partner to create a total solution. “This is a fundamental change in how we go to market,” he said.
And Ansley slammed rivals for developing overly complex channel programmatics and losing focus on the bottom line.
“Partners used to make money on the resale of products. All these programmatics have been institutionalised and no one can tell if they are making money any more,” he said. “We have a very straightforward programme where partners make money for the business they do.”
He added: “We are going to create a very narrow, profitable channel. Our cost structure allows us to do that because of our China-based strategy. I have the lowest design and development costs in industry. Last quarter we had the best gross margin in the company’s history and we want to share the wealth with partners.”
Related articles
CRN's premier networking event is back on 17 May at the Ricoh Arena
Date: Thu 17 May 2012
Channel fighters preparing to square up once more on 24 May
Date: Thu 24 May 2012
The proliferation of endpoint devices within the enterprise has highlighted the shortcomings of one of the traditional approaches to data security
This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps
Dave discovers that rozzers are seemingly living in the technology dark ages
Mark Needham, founder of distributor Widget, argues that John Browett leaves for Apple with Dixons in better shape than when he arrived
Do you agree?
Completely agree
I would have to agree that the channel has become far too complex for some infrastructure vendors. While a certain level of profitability remains on hardware, it relies upon specialist knowledge of specific programs and rebate schemes that are difficult to keep up with. Any simplification of this process would certainly help resellers and I would certainly like to see a return to the mind set of the mid 90's.
I would disagree with the stance that you can only back the one vendor though; in these trying times I believe the consumer wants choice and those resellers wanting to thrive in this environment will put forward solutions that match customer needs rather than trying to pigeon-hole a particular vendor. It is difficult to strike a balance between offering choice and spreading yourself too thinly but I believe this can be overcome with better partnerships within the channel.
Posted by Mike | 15 May 2009
Have your say