|
|
|
17 Aug 2009
Comments:5
Anti-piracy body The Business Software Alliance (BSA) has launched legal action against four manufacturing firms.
As part of its ongoing crackdown on unlicensed software use, the BSA has agreed settlements of more than £50,000, which does not include any legal costs incurred and reputational damage.
According to the BSA, in each case there was a shortfall between the software on the company’s computers and the licences produced.
Further reading
The companies were Samuel Bruce Limited, J Tools Limited, Garran Lockers Limited and International Automotive Components Group Limited (IAC).
Samuel Bruce Limited, a dealer and manufacturer of office products, agreed to a £20,000 settlement to reflect unlicensed use of Adobe, Autodesk and Microsoft software on an estimated 50 computers. The company also purchased about £8,000-worth of software to become legal.
Coventry-based J Tools Limited paid £7,000 in settlement fees for using unlicensed Autodesk and Microsoft software on about 20 computers. The company also bought an additional £10,000-worth of software licences.
Caerphilly-based Garran Lockers Limited was caught using unlicensed copies of Microsoft software on about 25 computers. As a result, the company had to pay £5,000 in settlement costs and new licences. The firm attributed the shortfall in licences to an under-performing director who has since left the company.
Julian Swan, director for compliance marketing EMEA BSA, said: "In the manufacturing sector, ensuring orders are completed on time and within budget is vital. If unlicensed software is used, companies do not have access to the same support services as legal versions, which can result in downtime and major delays, affecting profitability and the ability to deliver.
"In an industry where competition is fierce and reputation is paramount, businesses should not risk jeopardising their future by trying to cut corners – perceived cost savings from using unlicensed software is just an illusion."
International Automotive Components Group Limited (IAC), a manufacturer of car parts, was found to be using unlicensed Microsoft server software at one of the sites it acquired in early 2008.
Swan added: "The IAC case demonstrates the importance of showing due diligence and auditing software assets when purchasing or transitioning to new sites. The same principle applies to mergers and acquisitions; it is very common for companies to overlook the legality of their inherited software estate. Mistakes tend to happen when the management consider software compliance as just an IT problem.
"They do not realise that on a larger scale, failure to manage their software properly could expose the company to legal redress, not to mention operational failure as a result of running unlicensed and unprotected software."
The BSA said Samuel Bruce, J Tools Limited, Garran Lockers and International Automotive Components Group Limited were all co-operative throughout the investigations.
Matt Fisher, director of Centennial products at FrontRange Solutions, said: "The BSA is right to point out the 'reputational damage' which goes hand in hand with the financial penalty, as businesses cannot afford to lose the trust of consumers and partners in the current economic climate.
"With tools to facilitate software asset management readily available and simple to implement, there really is no excuse for any organisation to be found under-licensed, and all businesses should take heed of those being punished for non-compliance."
Related articles
In this video find out about the fast-growing Chinese vendor's plans for market domination and how the channel is its route of choice
Find out what gifts Acer has in store for partners for 2012 in this exclusive roundup of its recent conference
CRN's premier networking event is back on 17 May at the Ricoh Arena
Date: Thu 17 May 2012
Channel fighters preparing to square up once more on 24 May
Date: Thu 24 May 2012
The proliferation of endpoint devices within the enterprise has highlighted the shortcomings of one of the traditional approaches to data security
This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps
Dave discovers that rozzers are seemingly living in the technology dark ages
Mark Needham, founder of distributor Widget, argues that John Browett leaves for Apple with Dixons in better shape than when he arrived
|
|
|
Do you agree?
UK businesses certainly do need wake-up call regarding software asset management
From the powers accorded to the Federation Against Software Theft (FAST) to the importance of ISO 19770 software asset management standards, the stakes have recently been raised extremely high. Yet many organisations still fail to recognise that poor software licensing policies within the IT department could result in up to a 10 year jail term for company directors - not the IT team supposedly in charge of the software asset.
Organisations cannot afford to rely on piecemeal policies and inadequate asset information. It is only by instigating rigorous asset acquisition and disposal policies and recording detailed information about the software loaded onto every machine, including its serial number, that any company can attain real control over the software asset.
With this information to hand, organisations can immediately check for unlicensed software and manage user numbers against agreed licenses. If a machine is scrapped, rigorously updating the asset register will ensure that software can be reloaded on another machine, if the license allows. Furthermore, using alerts, an IT manager can be warned if user levels are reaching the license limit.
Inaccurate software asset registers are becoming a corporate liability. And, given the growing penalties facing senior managers across the UK, inaccurate software asset information is a board level issue.
Posted by Karen Conneely | 28 Aug 2009
Not really
Thanks for your comment Matt - Indeed FAST are Microsoft SAM Partners; this means that FAST are able to offer Microsoft's SAM Partner Programme certification for customers - the same as every other Microsoft SAM Partner in the UK. The reason FAST are offering this services is because their own membership programme is not recognised by Microsoft (or Adobe).
The BSA and its founding members rejected FAST when it was initially set up, now FAST are being forced to offer the Vendor Programmes that other specialists have offered for years.
Posted by GJH | 24 Aug 2009
FAST Fact
FAST Professional, Consulting and Managed Services (part of FAST Ltd) are Microsoft SAM Partners.
Posted by Matt Parsons | 21 Aug 2009
Alternatively....
Alternatively, rather than joining FAST, who are not recognised by Microsoft or Adobe (two or the largest backers of the BSA), companies could choose to work with a SAM Speciliast who is authorised by the vendors themselves and is recommended by the BSA.
Posted by GJH | 19 Aug 2009
Don't fall into the same software trap!
At FAST Ltd we are approached regularly by businesses that have been targeted by the BSA. The issue for these organisations is the lack of education and sound business process that would prevent this kind of licence mismanagement which always results in unexpected financial and workload impacts. Senior Management need to recognise that software asset management is critical to running a competitve business and only when investment is made will organisations reap the rewards.
Posted by Sarah Wootton | 18 Aug 2009
Have your say