Top-up scheme remains too pricey

Channel takeup of the government’s credit insurance top-up programme remains poor, despite attempts to improve it

By Doug Woodburn

More from this author

07 Sep 2009

Be the first to comment

  • Digg
  • Tweet
Whitehall
Whitehall washout: so far just 52 firms have taken advantage of the top-up scheme

The government’s credit insurance top-up scheme remains too expensive in the eyes of most channel players, despite recent improvements to the programme.

In a last-gasp attempt to improve disappointing takeup of the £5bn programme before it ends in December, the government has halved the price of top-up cover to one per cent.

With ETC the only major IT distributor known to have run with the scheme, channel takeup since it went live in May has been poor. Figures show that only 52 UK firms have benefited from the scheme to date.

Further reading

But distributors argue that the latest modifications will do little to help an IT channel working on one per cent profit margins.

Jon Bunyard, general manager at distributor CCD, said he still had “zero intention” of getting involved.

“The government is still on a different planet on this deal -­ one per cent of revenue is more than we make as an organisation.

“For the plan to appeal, it would have to reduce the price to a level that is competitive with our credit insurance costs,” he said.

The government has also removed the scheme’s lower limit of £20,000 and doubled the upper limit to £2m to help more firms.

Atradius,­ which is one of four private credit insurers backing the scheme, welcomed the fact that the government had taken its feedback on board.

Shaun Purrington, regional director of Atradius UK and Ireland, said: “The scheme is now more affordable and offers a broader range of cover, which should increase its appeal to UK businesses, particularly SMEs.”

The government had already amended the scheme in June to help firms that had seen their credit insurance cut before its introduction. Eddie Pacey, director of credit at distributor Bell Micro, said the fact that the scheme has been revised twice suggests it was hastily conceived.

“These latest changes are certainly helpful, but they are unlikely to shift our own position very much as the cost remains prohibitive.

“We would only consider it in an extreme situation, and one has not yet fully arisen.”

display:none
Loading
We won't publish your address
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication.

Will Apple's attitude to the channel change in 2012?

51%

21%

27%

1%

CRN Partner Connect 2012

CRN Partner Connect logo

CRN's premier networking event is back on 17 May at the Ricoh Arena

Date: Thu 17 May 2012

CRN Fight Night 2012

One of the fights from CRN Fight Night 2010

Channel fighters preparing to square up once more on 24 May

Date: Thu 24 May 2012

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Submit your email address and we'll send a link to a personal newsletter control panel

fragment image

The mobile enterprise: Secure the data, not the device

The proliferation of endpoint devices within the enterprise has highlighted the shortcomings of one of the traditional approaches to data security

fragment image

Measuring the ROI of Google Apps

This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps


Dave the dealer blog

Dave the dealer

Clocking off

Dave discovers that rozzers are seemingly living in the technology dark ages

View from the channel

Views from the Channel

Departing CEO has done Dixons a service

Mark Needham, founder of distributor Widget, argues that John Browett leaves for Apple with Dixons in better shape than when he arrived

To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.