04 Apr 2007
As predicted by CRN, VAR Xploite has completed the acquisition of Bristol-based Anix Group for a total of £10.45m. Xploite will pay a cash consideration of £4.35m and repay £6.10m of debt held by Anix.
Xploite (formerly known as Fujin) has previously told CRN it is looking to become a £100m storage business. Anix is focused mainly around storage and is an IBM Business Partner. For the year ended 31 December, Anix’s turnover was £35.5m and earnings before internet, tax and amortisation was £1.6 million. The company had £9m of recurring revenue from maintenance and services provided to customers and assets of £500,000.
Ian Smith, chief executive of Xploite, said in a statement: “In line with our stated strategy to expand in the IT storage services sub-sector, we now have a combined entity with annualised turnover in excess of £53m. We are very confident of extracting synergy and value from the combination of these two companies, which together have cost approximately £15m.”
Earlier this year Xploite acquires storage VAR Positiv for £4.6m, which
included its reseller agreement with storage vendor Network Appliance (NetApp)
Smith added: “There is an excellent opportunity to become a premier partner to
IBM in the UK and following IBM’s strategic decision to resell NetApp products
we are in a strong position to leverage our skills in both the IBM and NetApp
product sets, combining the experience within each of Posetiv and Anix”.
Further reading>>
Related articles
CRN's premier networking event is back on 17 May at the Ricoh Arena
Date: Thu 17 May 2012
Channel fighters preparing to square up once more on 24 May
Date: Thu 24 May 2012
The proliferation of endpoint devices within the enterprise has highlighted the shortcomings of one of the traditional approaches to data security
This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps
Dave discovers that rozzers are seemingly living in the technology dark ages
Mark Needham, founder of distributor Widget, argues that John Browett leaves for Apple with Dixons in better shape than when he arrived
Do you agree?
Have your say