|
|
|
27 Nov 2008
Security appliance vendor Cyberoam has launched an aggressive trade-in scheme to help resellers flush out the remainder of 2008 budgets.
Cyberoam has certified more than 15 resellers, including Networks Unlimited, Working IT Solutions and Breadth Technology, since it touched down in the UK in April (Channelweb, 1 May).
Kunal Popat, business development manager at Cyberoam, said: “We need to cash in on budgets that have been agreed for this year.”
Further reading
As part of the programme, end users can net a free Cyberoam appliance when
they buy two years’
service and its 8x5 maintenance and support package, potentially saving them up
to £6,410.
Nigel Arnold, operations director at Networks Unlimited, said the programme demonstrates Cyberoam’s aggressive intent.
“It is a crowded market, but Cyberoam has a unique offering. It is skewed towards ID-based unified threat management, which allows end users to control what users do from a security perspective,” he said.
Mukesh Gupta, managing director of Cyberoam’s sole UK distributor, e92plus, said: “This is an opportunity for users to move to a better firewall without a huge cost.”
Related articles
In this video find out about the fast-growing Chinese vendor's plans for market domination and how the channel is its route of choice
Find out what gifts Acer has in store for partners for 2012 in this exclusive roundup of its recent conference
CRN's premier networking event is back on 17 May at the Ricoh Arena
Date: Thu 17 May 2012
Channel fighters preparing to square up once more on 24 May
Date: Thu 24 May 2012
The proliferation of endpoint devices within the enterprise has highlighted the shortcomings of one of the traditional approaches to data security
This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps
Dave discovers that rozzers are seemingly living in the technology dark ages
Mark Needham, founder of distributor Widget, argues that John Browett leaves for Apple with Dixons in better shape than when he arrived
|
|
|
Do you agree?
Have your say