|
|
|
24 May 2010
Comments:1
The Government’s decision to axe education IT buying agency Becta has been met with approval by channel onlookers.
In a press statement earlier today, HM Treasury confirmed that the agency was one of a number of " low-value" programmes to be axed as part of a series of government spending reforms aimed at tackling the UK’s £156bn budget deficit.
The closure of Becta, which was set up in 1998 by Labour to promote learning through the use of technology, is expected to save the Department for Education £80m between 2010 and 2011.
Further reading
Paul Evans, managing director of Redstor, a back up and data management vendor that works with 85 local education authorities (LEAs), said the government’s decision did not come as a shock.
He said: “It is terrible news for the people who will lose their jobs, but these are austere times we are living in now and Becta is a luxury we cannot afford.”
Evans predicts that removing Becta, and its accompanying IT procurement framework, will be warmly welcomed by niche vendors that have struggled to find favour with the agency.
“In order to get on the framework, you had to prove to Becta that you could deliver a full range of IT services, making it difficult for firms that focus on one or two areas to get a look in,” he said.
“Potentially, this could present smaller, niche vendors with the opportunity to catch the attention of the public sector.”
This is a view shared by Lee Bevan, managing director of VAR Leapfrog AVIT.
“The announcement represents a massive opportunity for us,” he said. “Becta sometimes stood in the way of companies such as Leapfrog, preventing them from doing face-to-face work in the education sector.”
According to Becta’s website, part of its remit was to “develop propositions to achieve future efficiencies”.
Peter Dawes-Huish, chief executive of open source supplier Linux IT, said the organisation’s lack of vision prevented it from delivering on this front.
He said: “It [Becta] did not have the vision to encourage more widespread adoption of open source based platforms in the education sector, which could bring huge efficiency savings.”
Related articles
In this video find out about the fast-growing Chinese vendor's plans for market domination and how the channel is its route of choice
Find out what gifts Acer has in store for partners for 2012 in this exclusive roundup of its recent conference
CRN's premier networking event is back on 17 May at the Ricoh Arena
Date: Thu 17 May 2012
Channel fighters preparing to square up once more on 24 May
Date: Thu 24 May 2012
The proliferation of endpoint devices within the enterprise has highlighted the shortcomings of one of the traditional approaches to data security
This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps
Is encouraging young people to work for a few hours in exchange for their job seekers allowance taking advantage?
Dave discovers that rozzers are seemingly living in the technology dark ages
HP's new boss made all the right noises at HP GPC - but are words enough, asks CRN deputy editor Doug Woodburn
|
|
|
Do you agree?
Hip Hip Hooray
A very sad time for those who have lost their jobs.
For small VARS who specialise in education this is great news.
I have seen little evidence in the schools I have worked with that BECTA has improved value when purchasing ICT equipment - I'd go further to say their frameworks could have caused many schools to spend more as a result of tenders that were months and possibly years out of date.
Divide 29,000 UK schools into £80 million, that is £2,700 per school, per year!! That spent on equipment or software would put many more hands on keyboards and further schools ICT.
I don't see how BECTA could ever have returned that value in savings, schools simply don't spend enough.
Sensible procurement procedures which have always been in place (three like for like quotes) will achieve savings and ensure best value without all of the red tape and cost of BECTA.
The best news so far this year. :-)
Posted by Neil Farnham-Smith | 28 May 2010
Have your say