Unified Communications anything but

Single, fully integrated offerings should be prioritised, says Simon Paton

By Simon Paton

07 Nov 2008

Be the first to comment

  • Digg
  • Tweet

Voice-over IP (VoIP) margins are eroding as more players jostle for space in a crowded market. This situation demands a change in business model.

One solution is to broaden the portfolio: an ISP can offer voice traffic and an internet telephony provider email, website and domain hosting. Voicemail, instant messaging (IM) or even consumer-focused services can all be added to a unified communications platform.

Yet organisations providing consolidated voice and data services are reliant on myriad software and hardware solutions that deliver voice, instant messaging and email separately.

The reality for most service providers is resource-intensive, complex integration and escalating support costs. That makes for an unsustainably high total cost of ownership.

So organisations need to replace these multiple, diverse technology platforms with a single, integrated solution.

However, be warned: technology vendors are also struggling with unified communications, choosing to acquire a range of technologies to cobble together a “unified” voice and data offering.

As a result, many so-called unified communications solutions are anything but. Some actually require up to six separate systems to deliver the final “complete” product.

Organisations looking to maximise the unified communications opportunity with such product could wind up disappointed.

Organisations need to clearly evaluate the unified communications technology on offer. If it cannot deliver mail and collaboration, presence and IM, VoIP, web and directory using a single system the on-going cost of ownership, we think, may be prohibitive.

A single unified communications solution should integrate with existing billing technology. Adding unnecessary integration to the mix undermines the value of the investment.

A solution must also scale in line with business growth.

Few can afford a massive up-front capital investment on technology that could support thousands of users before that user base has been built up. Yet it is ridiculous to buy a small solution that will not support planned growth.

A more flexible approach is required. Using a Software as a Service (SaaS) model, ISPs can opt for monthly operational expenditure on a per-user price.

Simon Paton is managing director of CommuniGate

display:none
Loading
We won't publish your address
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication.

Will Apple's attitude to the channel change in 2012?

51%

21%

27%

1%

CRN Partner Connect 2012

CRN Partner Connect logo

CRN's premier networking event is back on 17 May at the Ricoh Arena

Date: Thu 17 May 2012

CRN Fight Night 2012

One of the fights from CRN Fight Night 2010

Channel fighters preparing to square up once more on 24 May

Date: Thu 24 May 2012

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Submit your email address and we'll send a link to a personal newsletter control panel

fragment image

The mobile enterprise: Secure the data, not the device

The proliferation of endpoint devices within the enterprise has highlighted the shortcomings of one of the traditional approaches to data security

fragment image

Measuring the ROI of Google Apps

This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps


Dave the dealer blog

Dave the dealer

Clocking off

Dave discovers that rozzers are seemingly living in the technology dark ages

View from the channel

Views from the Channel

Departing CEO has done Dixons a service

Mark Needham, founder of distributor Widget, argues that John Browett leaves for Apple with Dixons in better shape than when he arrived

To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.