Turbulent times mean businesses must make sure they trade safely. For over 100 years, trade credit insurance has quietly supported business growth, enabling trade, researching and supporting business with new markets and helping to establish trade links throughout the world.
Providing sellers with protection against the failure of a buyer to pay does
appear to help sell more products and services and stimulate economic growth.
Insurance has become essential to our lives, providing security when we access
the products and services we want. For businesses, trade credit insurance has
enabled rapid, more secure growth.
In the 1990s, consolidation was one of the driving forces in the development of
the credit insurance industry. That resulted in domination of today’s industry
by three international credit insurers.
Between them, this trio accounts for about 85 per cent of credit insurance
premiums globally. This worldwide consolidation shows why credit insurance is
valuable.
Recent months have shown just how global the economy has become. Not only can no
market operate in isolation, but it is simply not enough for many businesses to
transact business locally or even domestically.
Survival, for many players, means looking for opportunities outside their
traditional comfort zones; many players are now expanding their approach to hunt
for customers in new industries or territories.
Doing so, however, ups the risk. Cash sales would be ideal, but with competitors
trading on credit terms businesses need to offer good payment terms as well to
stay competitive.
At the same time, the buyers may be new and those new customers’
creditworthiness may be difficult to ascertain.
If such new customers decide not to pay, collecting on foreign receivables can
be long and painful.
On top of the commercial risk depending on the country of operation
businesses may be exposed to unanticipated political risks.
Despite around 20 years of a reasonably benign political risk environment, the
landscape appears to be shifting and global political instability is expected to
climb.
This can and in many cases will affect the security of your receivables in
those markets where the lack of a stable political environment can change the
ability of a buyer to pay or the payment practices of the buyer.
To do business internationally, determine which companies you should and should
not do business with. Pick the winners and you win, pick the losers and you may
go out of business even before they do.
But credit insurance is not just about knowing that someone is going to pay up.
Smart businesses are in the game to learn something.
With information on hundreds of millions of businesses right around the globe, updated daily, the global trade credit insurers often know the risks of dealing with a business before the business knows itself. And if you hold a trade credit policy against one of your purchasers, your insurer will flag any problems or trade risks with that business so you can take appropriate action, perhaps suspending trade or not shipping goods for which you may not get paid.
The consolidation of the credit insurance industry reflects a drive to build these worldwide operating platforms in response to globalisation.
Globalisation is also making compliance more complicated and expensive. We think trade credit insurance has become a “must have” when protecting against defaults stemming from commercial and political risk.
John Blackwell is senior communications manager at insurance company Atradius.
Related articles
CRN's premier networking event is back on 17 May at the Ricoh Arena
Date: Thu 17 May 2012
Channel fighters preparing to square up once more on 24 May
Date: Thu 24 May 2012
The proliferation of endpoint devices within the enterprise has highlighted the shortcomings of one of the traditional approaches to data security
This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps
Dave discovers that rozzers are seemingly living in the technology dark ages
Mark Needham, founder of distributor Widget, argues that John Browett leaves for Apple with Dixons in better shape than when he arrived
Do you agree?
Have your say