Virtual networking and removing complexity

Should 21st century applications remain on 20th century networks, asks Roger Hockaday

By Roger Hockaday

06 Aug 2009

Be the first to comment

  • Digg
  • Tweet
Roger Hockaday, marketing director at Aruba Networks
Roger Hockaday: New applications require newer networking ideas

The trend for virtualisation and hosting of applications in datacentres had already started to deliver on doing more with less before the onset of the current recession.

Applications – voice is a perfect example – are no longer hosted by a server in every office, but more often delivered from a single, secure location, offering a simplified, single point of management and control.

Centralising servers in the datacentre improves security and removes the need for specialist IT and internet security staff to manage tens or hundreds of remote servers.

Thin client applications also remove complexity from the edge, centralising management and improving security.

If moving complexity to the core is so beneficial, why are the remote networks that deliver these applications and services mired in a 10-year-old model of distributed complexity and high-cost edges?

Change can be difficult, particularly when there are vested interests involved. When WAN bandwidth was expensive, companies would hold most of their data locally, on servers in each office.

Applications would run locally, and the router was the device that created subnets, separated offices and stopped the expensive – and often limited – wide area connection from being overused.

Shrinking WAN costs and new xDSL services have improved connectivity, and now most large organisations host data and applications centrally.

Change has come, but not to remote networking. It could be argued that networking vendors with core businesses built on the router have a stake in the status quo – or at least ensuring all new networking solutions continue to be based around a router in every office.

But the same can’t be said of the integrator. A good technology partner – one that has value to an enterprise – one that can differentiate itself and make margin from services – should be prepared to be innovative, challenge the status quo, and look for change occurring within the end user customer.

The risk is that an integrator’s service may become a commodity, and the relationship with the end user stagnate, when the end user needs advice most.

‘Doing more with less’ entails a new way of thinking about problems. It means reconsidering the old ways, that may mean over-building complex, expensive infrastructure.

The first priority needs to be the end objective – enhancing mobility, simplifying networking and connecting users to their applications. Tool selection should be determined by the end objective, not the other way around.

When a customer wants to extend its corporate network to a branch office, the old way advocated installation of a router at every remote location.

VLANs and subnets controlled and managed users in campus environments, so that model was extended to branch offices. Systems pushed by router vendors needed routers, when a router might not always have been the best choice.

Are there better tools in the toolbox? Consider virtualisation: if the benefits of application virtualisation, such as simpler management, better security and easier delivery, from a central location are proven, can’t the branch network itself be virtualised?

Virtualising the branch network effectively creates a layer 2 tunnel across any layer 3 network. This connects end users and their devices – laptops, phones or scanners directly to the datacentre without routing at the edge.

After all, most of the traffic, most of the time, comes back to the datacentre.

Virtualisation of the branch office removes the need to configure complex routers at each and every remote office – and all the associated WAN interfaces, LAN interfaces, Access Control Lists, VLANs, DHCP and DNS services, authentication services, voice services, QoS Services, wired and wireless access policies.

Virtual branch networking allows integrators to deliver more with less. It challenges tradition and allows them to differentiate not just the service they deliver, but also their value to the end user.

Those who embrace change will receive their reward. Those who try to maintain the status quo will fail.

Roger Hockaday is director of marketing at Aruba Networks

display:none
Loading
We won't publish your address
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication.

Will Apple's attitude to the channel change in 2012?

51%

22%

26%

1%

CRN Partner Connect 2012

CRN Partner Connect logo

CRN's premier networking event is back on 17 May at the Ricoh Arena

Date: Thu 17 May 2012

CRN Fight Night 2012

One of the fights from CRN Fight Night 2010

Channel fighters preparing to square up once more on 24 May

Date: Thu 24 May 2012

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Submit your email address and we'll send a link to a personal newsletter control panel

fragment image

The mobile enterprise: Secure the data, not the device

The proliferation of endpoint devices within the enterprise has highlighted the shortcomings of one of the traditional approaches to data security

fragment image

Measuring the ROI of Google Apps

This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps


Dave the dealer blog

Dave the dealer

Clocking off

Dave discovers that rozzers are seemingly living in the technology dark ages

View from the channel

Views from the Channel

Departing CEO has done Dixons a service

Mark Needham, founder of distributor Widget, argues that John Browett leaves for Apple with Dixons in better shape than when he arrived

To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.