No need for complete VDI migration
Christophe Corne believes combining VDI with server based computing is best for many users
Corne: Combining VDI with server based computing should suit more customers
Desktop virtualisation or Virtualised Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) is a technology which I think everyone is talking about. Operating systems and applications are not directly installed on user desktops but on servers, so IT managers have an easier time managing individual desktops.
Nothing changes for the user but the fact he or she is actually accessing an image, or virtual representation of the system, linked to the datacentre where the system is hosted.
A company with 1,000 traditional PCs running Vista can use VDI and do the migration in a few server-based clicks. The ultimate solution of course is to deploy thin clients, which are cheaper and need less energy.
All this sounds great but there are a few things holding back wider adoption.
At first glance, VDI looks suspiciously similar to old-school server based computing, application virtualisation or application publishing. Server based computing has applications working on remote servers and relaying the virtual image to the user’s desktop, but the applications are virtualised rather than the whole operating system.
Server based computing is used to manage application lifecycles, especially for installing the latest software updates, whereas VDI generally keeps the applications anchored within the operating system.
Many of our customers have told us that they were impressed by the potential of VDI but have given up after an initial test, because they struggled to maintain applications or to reach the same level of service that they enjoyed with the ‘old’ server based computing.
Another disadvantage is the cost of VDI deployment when migrating to a new OS. Storage costs are quite high for VDI but nonexistent for server based computing. An office with 200-300 seats needs at least 10GB, and 1GB of RAM for each user.
Server based computing only requires 200MB of RAM, and no storage space for the desktop.
I think that VDI makes most sense combined with server based computing. You get the ability for complete desktop personalisation by user need, and total OS compatibility.
This means adapting your approach to virtualisation according to your customer’s needs. You can start by centralising and virtualising applications, then do desktop virtualisation for individual cases where server based computing does not suit.
Even when using desktop virtualisation, you can use server based computing to maintain application lifecycles inside the virtualised desktop. And user needs are becoming ever more diverse.
Virtualise your applications as soon as possible, then introduce desktop virtualisation gradually in response to specific needs.
Christophe Corne is founder and chief executive officer of Systancia