In the Studio with CRN: HMRC vs traders

In a heated discussion, CRN Editor Sara Yirrell chats to three people passionate about the plight of IT and mobile phone traders caught up in HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) Extended Verification process to combat VAT fraud.

Joining CRN in the studio is Anthony Elliot-Square, managing director of International Phone Traders, Dave Fisher, managing director of Silicon8 (who is waiting for a significant VAT payment back from HMRC) and John Champion, partner at Mclein Reid accountants and auditors.

Hear how traders such as Dave are fighting against the tide to get their money back and are being caught up in lengthy and costly legal battles with the government.

We also feature a statement from HMRC (who couldn't attend filming) on the issue to keep it balanced.

Footnote:

Due to popular demand - here is the HMRC statement in full:

"MTIC VAT fraud is an organised criminal attack on the VAT system with the aim of stealing revenue which is needed to fund essential public services.

All VAT repayment claims received by HMRC are subject to checking to varying degrees - Extended verification is a key element off HMRC’s strategy to tackle Missing Trader Intra-Community (MTIC) VAT fraud. Selection for verification is risk based and underpinned by intelligence targeting specific trading behaviour and not specific commodities.

Where a trade sector is seriously affected by fraud (which was the case for mobile phones), HMRC will carry out further and extended checks to verify the often very large claims for repayment of VAT – indeed HMRC is duty bound to do so

Inevitably these extended checks will take time – however in most cases the Courts have recognised this and have supported the need for the extended verification of repayment claims as part of HMRC’s efforts to tackle this fraud particularly given that the vast majority of transactions subjected to extended verification have been found to be connected with fraud.

The Court of Appeal recently confirmed that HMRC can continue to apply the test without the need for implementing UK legislation. HMRC will continue to deny input tax claims where it is found that the transactions are connected with the fraudulent evasion of VAT and that the trader knew or should have known of this.

HMRC does not “trap” traders – it is for businesses themselves to decide how they trade and to be aware of the tax consequences that flow from that. HMRC is committed to working with all interested parties to seek solutions to tackle this fraud. In an effort to increase awareness, HMRC issued a public notice as far back as 2006 to help businesses to spot MTIC fraud.

Extended verification is a labour-intensive and often lengthy procedure and not one that HMRC undertakes lightly. If a trader is uncertain about any business relationship then they should carry out the appropriate level of risk management checks.

HMRC will continue to deny input tax claims where it is found that the transactions are connected with the fraudulent evasion of VAT and that the trader knew or should have known of this."

Not only HRMC

Not only have the Govt. in countries taken what could be described as valid - if not reasonable. Companies/organisations such as Google Checkout, and PayPal have aso taken unilateral action which have devasted companies - such as my own, PLUS refusing access to the legitimate monies received.
There is no way to contact these people to try and resolve issues despite providing all paperwork requested.
There are now several websites appearing stating the problems with these companies, that surely verges on theft.
See also PayPal Sucks, and Google Checkout Sucks to see how this represents a huge danger for the unsuspecting small business.

Posted by Norman Clark | 13 Feb 2011

HMRC vs traders

Interesting, strange, and SAD.
This is UK not some third world dictatorship where the law of the jungle - so to speak - applies
and where civil servants behave according to their impressions, suspicions, personal feelings and opinions not according to Laws.
You are either guilty and punished or NOT GUILTY and be left alone to carry on your business and carrry on your life peacefully and not be destroyed by civil servants as appears to be happening in the UK.
I could not believe such a thing could happen in the UK.

Posted by Salah Hassan | 29 Aug 2010

display:none
Loading
We won't publish your address
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication.

CRN Partner Connect 2012

CRN Partner Connect logo

CRN's premier networking event is back on 17 May at the Ricoh Arena

Date: Thu 17 May 2012

CRN Fight Night 2012

One of the fights from CRN Fight Night 2010

Channel fighters preparing to square up once more on 24 May

Date: Thu 24 May 2012

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Submit your email address and we'll send a link to a personal newsletter control panel

fragment image

The mobile enterprise: Secure the data, not the device

The proliferation of endpoint devices within the enterprise has highlighted the shortcomings of one of the traditional approaches to data security

fragment image

Measuring the ROI of Google Apps

This Forrester report compares the costs and benefits of legacy email and productivity software with Google Apps


Dave the dealer blog

Dave the dealer

Clocking off

Dave discovers that rozzers are seemingly living in the technology dark ages

View from the channel

Views from the Channel

Departing CEO has done Dixons a service

Mark Needham, founder of distributor Widget, argues that John Browett leaves for Apple with Dixons in better shape than when he arrived

To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.